1.
Mills, C. W. Alternative Epistemologies. in Blackness Visible : Essays on Philosophy and Race 21–40 (Cornell University Press, 1998).
2.
Hartsock, N. C. M. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. in Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science vol. v. 161 283–310 (Reidel, 1983).
3.
McKinnon, R. Trans*formative Experiences. Res Philosophica (preprint deposited by the author on academia.edu) 92, 419–440 (2015).
4.
standpoint epistemology in podcasts | Listen Notes. https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=standpoint%20epistemology&sort_by_date=0&scope=episode&offset=0&language=Any%20language&len_min=0&ecount_min=0.
5.
Fricker, M. Hermeneutic Injustice (follow also for the whole book). in Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing 147–175 (Oxford University Press, 2009).
6.
Nora Berenstain. Epistemic Exploitation. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3, (2016).
7.
Jenkins, K. Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices. Journal of Applied Philosophy 34, 191–205 (2017).
8.
Kristie Dotson. A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 33, (2012).
9.
Wesley Buckwalter. Epistemic Injustice in Social Cognition. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
10.
28: Philosophy and #MeToo with Emily McWilliams - Examining Ethics (podcast) | Listen Notes. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/examining-ethics/28-philosophy-and-metoo-with--ghaHy9C2Bw/.
11.
Prof Miranda Fricker - Epistemic Injustice - Radical Philosophy (podcast) | Listen Notes. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/radical-philosophy/prof-miranda-fricker-8CQ7_TV-oDh/.
12.
Beeby, L. A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 111, 479–486 (2011).
13.
Stroud, B. The significance of philosophical scepticism. (Clarendon, 1984).
14.
Williams, M. Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. (Oxford University Press, 2001).
15.
Descartes, R., Weissman, D., Bluhm, W. T. & Descartes, R. Meditation One. in Discourse on the method: and, Meditations on first philosophy 58–62 (Yale University Press).
16.
Ayer, A. J. The problem of knowledge. (Penguin, 1956).
17.
Robinson, H. Perception. (Routledge, 1994).
18.
Austin, J. L. & Warnock, G. J. Sense and sensibilia. (Clarendon Press, 1962).
19.
Fischer, E., Engelhardt, P. E., Horvath, J. & Ohtani, H. Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences. Synthese (2019) doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4.
20.
Blackmore, S. J. Consciousness: a very short introduction. vol. 121 (Oxford University Press, 2017).
21.
Chalmers, D. J. The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. (Oxford University Press, 1996).
22.
Gettier, E. L. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 23, (1963).
23.
Williams, M. Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. (Oxford University Press, 2001).
24.
Fogelin, R. J. Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. (Oxford University Press, 1994).
25.
Williams, M. Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. (Oxford University Press, 2001).
26.
Fogelin, R. J. Chapter 2: Fourth-Clause Theories. in Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification 31–40 (Oxford University Press, 1994).
27.
Keith DeRose. Introduction: Responding to Skepticism. in Skepticism: a contemporary reader (Oxford University Press, 1999).
28.
Holyoak, K. J., Morrison, R. G. & Holyoak, K. J. A model of heuristic judgment. in The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
29.
Alexander, JoshuaWeiburg, Jonathan M. Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 2, 56–80 (2007).
30.
Kenneth Boyd & Jennifer Nagel. The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions. in Current controversies in experimental philosophy 109–127 (Routledge, 2014).
31.
Berker, S. THE REJECTION OF EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM. Philosophical Issues 23, 363–387 (2013).
32.
Singer, D. J. How to be an Epistemic Consequentialist. The Philosophical Quarterly 68, 580–602 (2018).
33.
Roberts, P., Andow, J. & Schmidtke, K. A. Lay intuitions about epistemic normativity. Synthese 195, 3267–3287 (2018).
34.
Shaffer, J. & Knobe, J. Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed. Noûs (2012).
35.
DeRose, K. Contextualism, contrastivism, and X-Phi surveys. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition (2011).
36.
Buckwalter, W. Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1, 395–406 (2010).
37.
Nagel, Jennifer. The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox. PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT (2011).
38.
Gerken, M. & Beebe, J. Knowledge in and out of Contrast. Nous (2016).
39.
Nagel, J. Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases. in Knowledge ascriptions 171–191 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
