28: Philosophy and #MeToo with Emily McWilliams - Examining Ethics (podcast) | Listen Notes (no date). Available at: https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/examining-ethics/28-philosophy-and-metoo-with--ghaHy9C2Bw/.
Alexander, JoshuaWeiburg, Jonathan M (2007) ‘Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophy Compass, 2(1), pp. 56–80. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pif&AN=PHL2103227&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Austin, J.L. and Warnock, G.J. (1962) Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ayer, A.J. (1956) The problem of knowledge. London: Penguin.
Beeby, L. (2011) ‘A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 111(3pt3), pp. 479–486. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00319.x.
Berker, S. (2013) ‘THE REJECTION OF EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM’, Philosophical Issues, 23(1), pp. 363–387. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12019.
Blackmore, S.J. (2017) Consciousness: a very short introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buckwalter, W. (2010) ‘Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(3), pp. 395–406. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0030-3.
Chalmers, D.J. (1996) The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=272854.
DeRose, K. (2011) ‘Contextualism, contrastivism, and X-Phi surveys’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition [Preprint]. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.41487722&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Descartes, R. et al. (no date) ‘Meditation One’, in Discourse on the method: and, Meditations on first philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 58–62. Available at: https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=52973&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Fischer, E. et al. (2019) ‘Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences’, Synthese [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4.
Fogelin, R.J. (1994a) ‘Chapter 2: Fourth-Clause Theories’, in Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–40. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=3052370&ppg=46.
Fogelin, R.J. (1994b) Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification [electronic resource]. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3052370.
Fricker, M. (2009) ‘Hermeneutic Injustice (follow also for the whole book)’, in Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–175. Available at: http://www.uea.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=694009.
Gerken, M. and Beebe, J. (2016) ‘Knowledge in and out of Contrast’, Nous [Preprint]. Available at: https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com/doi/10.1111/nous.12064.
Gettier, E.L. (1963) ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis, 23(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3326922.
Hartsock, N.C.M. (1983) ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 283–310. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3035986.
Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, R.G. and Holyoak, K.J. (2005) ‘A model of heuristic judgment’, in The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, K. (2017) ‘Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), pp. 191–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12174.
Keith DeRose (1999) ‘Introduction: Responding to Skepticism’, in Skepticism: a contemporary reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kenneth Boyd and Jennifer Nagel (2014) ‘The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions’, in Current controversies in experimental philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 109–127. Available at: https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203122884.
Kristie Dotson (2012) ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression’, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024.
McKinnon, R. (2015) ‘Trans*formative Experiences’, Res Philosophica (preprint deposited by the author on academia.edu), 92(2), pp. 419–440. Available at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gxlo1wqji8n4l2d/Trans_formative_Experiences%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0.
Mills, C.W. (1998) ‘Alternative Epistemologies’, in Blackness Visible : Essays on Philosophy and Race. Cornell University Press, pp. 21–40. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1508193&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Nagel, J. (2012) ‘Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases’, in Knowledge ascriptions. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–191. Available at: https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693702.001.0001.
Nagel, Jennifer (2011) ‘The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox’, PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT [Preprint]. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000208856300001&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Nora Berenstain (2016) ‘Epistemic Exploitation’, Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 3(22). Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ergo/12405314.0003.022/--epistemic-exploitation?rgn=main;view=fulltext.
Prof Miranda Fricker - Epistemic Injustice - Radical Philosophy (podcast) | Listen Notes (no date). Available at: https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/radical-philosophy/prof-miranda-fricker-8CQ7_TV-oDh/.
Roberts, P., Andow, J. and Schmidtke, K.A. (2018) ‘Lay intuitions about epistemic normativity’, Synthese, 195(7), pp. 3267–3287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1371-6.
Robinson, H. (1994) Perception. London: Routledge. Available at: https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203164358.
Shaffer, J. and Knobe, J. (2012) ‘Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed’, Noûs [Preprint]. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.41682692&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Singer, D.J. (2018) ‘How to be an Epistemic Consequentialist’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 68(272), pp. 580–602. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx056.
standpoint epistemology in podcasts | Listen Notes (no date). Available at: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=standpoint%20epistemology&sort_by_date=0&scope=episode&offset=0&language=Any%20language&len_min=0&ecount_min=0.
Stroud, B. (1984) The significance of philosophical scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3053315.
Wesley Buckwalter (no date) ‘Epistemic Injustice in Social Cognition’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy [Preprint]. Available at: https://philpapers.org/rec/BUCEII.
Williams, M. (2001a) Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. (2001b) Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. (2001c) Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.