28: Philosophy and #MeToo with Emily McWilliams - Examining Ethics (podcast) | Listen Notes. (n.d.). https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/examining-ethics/28-philosophy-and-metoo-with--ghaHy9C2Bw/
Alexander, JoshuaWeiburg, Jonathan M. (2007). Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 56–80. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pif&AN=PHL2103227&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site
Austin, J. L., & Warnock, G. J. (1962). Sense and sensibilia. Clarendon Press.
Ayer, A. J. (1956). The problem of knowledge. Penguin.
Beeby, L. (2011). A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 111(3pt3), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00319.x
Berker, S. (2013). THE REJECTION OF EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM. Philosophical Issues, 23(1), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12019
Blackmore, S. J. (2017). Consciousness: a very short introduction (Second edition, Vol. 121). Oxford University Press.
Buckwalter, W. (2010). Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0030-3
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=272854
DeRose, K. (2011). Contextualism, contrastivism, and X-Phi surveys. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.41487722&site=eds-live&scope=site
Descartes, R., Weissman, D., Bluhm, W. T., & Descartes, R. (n.d.). Meditation One. In Discourse on the method: and, Meditations on first philosophy (pp. 58–62). Yale University Press. https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=52973&site=eds-live&scope=site
Fischer, E., Engelhardt, P. E., Horvath, J., & Ohtani, H. (2019). Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4
Fogelin, R. J. (1994a). Chapter 2: Fourth-Clause Theories [Electronic resource]. In Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification (pp. 31–40). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=3052370&ppg=46
Fogelin, R. J. (1994b). Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3052370
Fricker, M. (2009). Hermeneutic Injustice (follow also for the whole book). In Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing (pp. 147–175). Oxford University Press. http://www.uea.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=694009
Gerken, M., & Beebe, J. (2016). Knowledge in and out of Contrast. Nous. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com/doi/10.1111/nous.12064
Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.2307/3326922
Hartsock, N. C. M. (1983). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. In Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science: Vol. v. 161 (pp. 283–310). Reidel. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3035986
Holyoak, K. J., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, K. (2017). Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 34(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12174
Keith DeRose. (1999). Introduction: Responding to Skepticism. In Skepticism: a contemporary reader. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth Boyd & Jennifer Nagel. (2014). The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions [Electronic resource]. In Current controversies in experimental philosophy (pp. 109–127). Routledge. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203122884
Kristie Dotson. (2012). A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024
McKinnon, R. (2015). Trans*formative Experiences. Res Philosophica (Preprint Deposited by the Author on Academia.Edu), 92(2), 419–440. https://www.dropbox.com/s/gxlo1wqji8n4l2d/Trans_formative_Experiences%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0
Mills, C. W. (1998). Alternative Epistemologies. In Blackness Visible : Essays on Philosophy and Race (pp. 21–40). Cornell University Press. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1508193&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site
Nagel, J. (2012). Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases [Electronic resource]. In Knowledge ascriptions (1st ed, pp. 171–191). Oxford University Press. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693702.001.0001
Nagel, Jennifer. (2011). The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox. PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000208856300001&site=eds-live&scope=site
Nora Berenstain. (2016). Epistemic Exploitation. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 3(22). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ergo/12405314.0003.022/--epistemic-exploitation?rgn=main;view=fulltext
Prof Miranda Fricker - Epistemic Injustice - Radical Philosophy (podcast) | Listen Notes. (n.d.). https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/radical-philosophy/prof-miranda-fricker-8CQ7_TV-oDh/
Roberts, P., Andow, J., & Schmidtke, K. A. (2018). Lay intuitions about epistemic normativity. Synthese, 195(7), 3267–3287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1371-6
Robinson, H. (1994). Perception. Routledge. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203164358
Shaffer, J., & Knobe, J. (2012). Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed. Noûs. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.41682692&site=eds-live&scope=site
Singer, D. J. (2018). How to be an Epistemic Consequentialist. The Philosophical Quarterly, 68(272), 580–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx056
standpoint epistemology in podcasts | Listen Notes. (n.d.). https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=standpoint%20epistemology&sort_by_date=0&scope=episode&offset=0&language=Any%20language&len_min=0&ecount_min=0
Stroud, B. (1984). The significance of philosophical scepticism. Clarendon. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3053315
Wesley Buckwalter. (n.d.). Epistemic Injustice in Social Cognition. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. https://philpapers.org/rec/BUCEII
Williams, M. (2001a). Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. (2001b). Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Williams, M. (2001c). Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford University Press.