‘28: Philosophy and #MeToo with Emily McWilliams - Examining Ethics (Podcast) | Listen Notes’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/examining-ethics/28-philosophy-and-metoo-with--ghaHy9C2Bw/>.
Alexander, JoshuaWeiburg, Jonathan M. ‘Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy’. Philosophy Compass 2.1 (2007): 56–80. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=pif&amp;AN=PHL2103227&amp;authtype=sso&amp;custid=s8993828&amp;site=eds-live&amp;scope=site>.
Austin, J. L., and G. J. Warnock. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. Print.
Ayer, A. J. The Problem of Knowledge. London: Penguin, 1956. Print.
Beeby, Laura. ‘A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 111.3pt3 (2011): 479–486. Web.
Berker, Selim. ‘THE REJECTION OF EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM’. Philosophical Issues 23.1 (2013): 363–387. Web.
Blackmore, Susan J. Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction. Second edition. Vol. 121. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Print.
Buckwalter, Wesley. ‘Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language’. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1.3 (2010): 395–406. Web.
Chalmers, David John. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=272854>.
DeRose, Keith. ‘Contextualism, Contrastivism, and X-Phi Surveys’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=edsjsr&amp;AN=edsjsr.41487722&amp;site=eds-live&amp;scope=site>.
Descartes, René et al. ‘Meditation One’. Discourse on the Method: And, Meditations on First Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. 58–62. Web. <https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=52973&amp;site=eds-live&amp;scope=site>.
Fischer, Eugen et al. ‘Experimental Ordinary Language Philosophy: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Defeasible Default Inferences’. Synthese (2019): n. pag. Web.
Fogelin, Robert J. ‘Chapter 2: Fourth-Clause Theories’. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. 31–40. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=3052370&amp;ppg=46>.
---. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3052370>.
Fricker, Miranda. ‘Hermeneutic Injustice (Follow Also for the Whole Book)’. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 147–175. Web. <http://www.uea.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=694009>.
Gerken, Mikkel, and James Beebe. ‘Knowledge in and out of Contrast’. Nous (2016): n. pag. Web. <https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com/doi/10.1111/nous.12064>.
Gettier, Edmund L. ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’ Analysis 23.6 (1963): n. pag. Web.
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. v. 161. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. 283–310. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3035986>.
Holyoak, Keith James, Robert G. Morrison, and Keith James Holyoak. ‘A Model of Heuristic Judgment’. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Print.
Jenkins, Katharine. ‘Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices’. Journal of Applied Philosophy 34.2 (2017): 191–205. Web.
Keith DeRose. ‘Introduction: Responding to Skepticism’. Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Print.
Kenneth Boyd and Jennifer Nagel. ‘The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions’. Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2014. 109–127. Web. <https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203122884>.
Kristie Dotson. ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression’. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 33.1 (2012): n. pag. Web.
McKinnon, Rachel. ‘Trans*formative Experiences’. Res Philosophica (preprint deposited by the author on academia.edu) 92.2 (2015): 419–440. Web. <https://www.dropbox.com/s/gxlo1wqji8n4l2d/Trans_formative_Experiences%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0>.
Mills, Charles W. ‘Alternative Epistemologies’. Blackness Visible : Essays on Philosophy and Race. Cornell University Press, 1998. 21–40. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=1508193&amp;authtype=sso&amp;custid=s8993828&amp;site=eds-live&amp;scope=site>.
Nagel, Jennifer. ‘Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases’. Knowledge Ascriptions. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 171–191. Web. <https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693702.001.0001>.
Nagel, Jennifer. ‘The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox’. PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT (2011): n. pag. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=edswah&amp;AN=000208856300001&amp;site=eds-live&amp;scope=site>.
Nora Berenstain. ‘Epistemic Exploitation’. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 3.22 (2016): n. pag. Web. <https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ergo/12405314.0003.022/--epistemic-exploitation?rgn=main;view=fulltext>.
‘Prof Miranda Fricker - Epistemic Injustice - Radical Philosophy (Podcast) | Listen Notes’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/radical-philosophy/prof-miranda-fricker-8CQ7_TV-oDh/>.
Roberts, Pendaran, James Andow, and Kelly Ann Schmidtke. ‘Lay Intuitions about Epistemic Normativity’. Synthese 195.7 (2018): 3267–3287. Web.
Robinson, Howard. Perception. London: Routledge, 1994. Web. <https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203164358>.
Shaffer, Jonathan, and Joshua Knobe. ‘Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed’. Noûs (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=edsjsr&amp;AN=edsjsr.41682692&amp;site=eds-live&amp;scope=site>.
Singer, Daniel J. ‘How to Be an Epistemic Consequentialist’. The Philosophical Quarterly 68.272 (2018): 580–602. Web.
‘Standpoint Epistemology in Podcasts | Listen Notes’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=standpoint%20epistemology&amp;sort_by_date=0&amp;scope=episode&amp;offset=0&amp;language=Any%20language&amp;len_min=0&amp;ecount_min=0>.
Stroud, Barry. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984. Web. <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3053315>.
Wesley Buckwalter. ‘Epistemic Injustice in Social Cognition’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy n. pag. Web. <https://philpapers.org/rec/BUCEII>.
Williams, Michael. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.
---. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.
---. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.