1.
Mills CW. Alternative Epistemologies. In: Blackness Visible : Essays on Philosophy and Race. Cornell University Press; 1998:21-40. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1508193&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site
2.
Hartsock NCM. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. In: Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Vol v. 161. Reidel; 1983:283-310. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3035986
3.
McKinnon R. Trans*formative Experiences. Res Philosophica (preprint deposited by the author on academia.edu). 2015;92(2):419-440. https://www.dropbox.com/s/gxlo1wqji8n4l2d/Trans_formative_Experiences%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0
4.
standpoint epistemology in podcasts | Listen Notes. https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=standpoint%20epistemology&sort_by_date=0&scope=episode&offset=0&language=Any%20language&len_min=0&ecount_min=0
5.
Fricker M. Hermeneutic Injustice (follow also for the whole book). In: Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press; 2009:147-175. http://www.uea.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=694009
6.
Nora Berenstain. Epistemic Exploitation. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 2016;3(22). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ergo/12405314.0003.022/--epistemic-exploitation?rgn=main;view=fulltext
7.
Jenkins K. Rape Myths and Domestic Abuse Myths as Hermeneutical Injustices. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2017;34(2):191-205. doi:10.1111/japp.12174
8.
Kristie Dotson. A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 2012;33(1). doi:10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024
9.
Wesley Buckwalter. Epistemic Injustice in Social Cognition. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. https://philpapers.org/rec/BUCEII
10.
28: Philosophy and #MeToo with Emily McWilliams - Examining Ethics (podcast) | Listen Notes. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/examining-ethics/28-philosophy-and-metoo-with--ghaHy9C2Bw/
11.
Prof Miranda Fricker - Epistemic Injustice - Radical Philosophy (podcast) | Listen Notes. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/radical-philosophy/prof-miranda-fricker-8CQ7_TV-oDh/
12.
Beeby L. A Critique of Hermeneutical Injustice. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback). 2011;111(3pt3):479-486. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2011.00319.x
13.
Stroud B. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Clarendon; 1984. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3053315
14.
Williams M. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford University Press; 2001.
15.
Descartes R, Weissman D, Bluhm WT, Descartes R. Meditation One. In: Discourse on the Method: And, Meditations on First Philosophy. Yale University Press; :58-62. https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=52973&site=eds-live&scope=site
16.
Ayer AJ. The Problem of Knowledge. Penguin; 1956.
17.
Robinson H. Perception. Routledge; 1994. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203164358
18.
Austin JL, Warnock GJ. Sense and Sensibilia. Clarendon Press; 1962.
19.
Fischer E, Engelhardt PE, Horvath J, Ohtani H. Experimental ordinary language philosophy: a cross-linguistic study of defeasible default inferences. Synthese. Published online 17 January 2019. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02081-4
20.
Blackmore SJ. Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction. Vol 121. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
21.
Chalmers DJ. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press; 1996. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=272854
22.
Gettier EL. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis. 1963;23(6). doi:10.2307/3326922
23.
Williams M. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford University Press; 2001.
24.
Fogelin RJ. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford University Press; 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=3052370
25.
Williams M. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford University Press; 2001.
26.
Fogelin RJ. Chapter 2: Fourth-Clause Theories. In: Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford University Press; 1994:31-40. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=3052370&ppg=46
27.
Keith DeRose. Introduction: Responding to Skepticism. In: Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. Oxford University Press; 1999.
28.
Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, Holyoak KJ. A model of heuristic judgment. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
29.
Alexander, JoshuaWeiburg, Jonathan M. Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy. Philosophy Compass. 2007;2(1):56-80. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pif&AN=PHL2103227&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=eds-live&scope=site
30.
Kenneth Boyd, Jennifer Nagel. The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions. In: Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge; 2014:109-127. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780203122884
31.
Berker S. THE REJECTION OF EPISTEMIC CONSEQUENTIALISM. Philosophical Issues. 2013;23(1):363-387. doi:10.1111/phis.12019
32.
Singer DJ. How to be an Epistemic Consequentialist. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2018;68(272):580-602. doi:10.1093/pq/pqx056
33.
Roberts P, Andow J, Schmidtke KA. Lay intuitions about epistemic normativity. Synthese. 2018;195(7):3267-3287. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1371-6
34.
Shaffer J, Knobe J. Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed. Noûs. Published online 2012. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.41682692&site=eds-live&scope=site
35.
DeRose K. Contextualism, contrastivism, and X-Phi surveys. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. Published online 2011. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.41487722&site=eds-live&scope=site
36.
Buckwalter W. Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2010;1(3):395-406. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0030-3
37.
Nagel, Jennifer. The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox. PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT. Published online 2011. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000208856300001&site=eds-live&scope=site
38.
Gerken M, Beebe J. Knowledge in and out of Contrast. Nous. Published online 2016. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com/doi/10.1111/nous.12064
39.
Nagel J. Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases. In: Knowledge Ascriptions. 1st ed. Oxford University Press; 2012:171-191. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693702.001.0001