[1]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[2]
K. C. Dunn, Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=188816&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[3]
H. Spruyt, The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change, vol. Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
[4]
M. Hollis and S. Smith, ‘Introduction: In: Explaining and understanding international relations’, in Explaining and understanding international relations, Oxford: Clarendon, 1990, pp. 1–15.
[5]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Introduction and chapter 1’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 1–35.
[6]
J. Burbank and F. Cooper, ‘Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference’, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
[7]
T. M. Wilson and H. Donnan, ‘Chapter 8 Borders in the New Imperialism’, in A companion to border studies, vol. Blackwell companions to anthropology, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118255223
[8]
H. Spruyt, ‘Chapter 8 in “The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change” / Spruyt’, in The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change, vol. Princeton studies in international history and politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 153–180.
[9]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter “Structural Realism (John J. Mearsheimer)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 77–93.
[10]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter 5 Bruce Russett “Liberalism” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[11]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter 6 Jennifer Sterling-Folker. "Neoliberalism.” International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[12]
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett, ‘The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 267–293, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013934?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[13]
R. O. Keohane, ‘Chapter 1’, in After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy, 1st Princeton classic ed., vol. A Princeton classic edition, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005.
[14]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter “Marxism (Mark Rupert)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[15]
E. O. Czempiel and J. N. Rosenau, ‘“Production, the State, and Change in World Order” in Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s’, in Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s, vol. Issues in world politics, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989.
[16]
M. Rupert and H. Smith, ‘Capitalist globalization and the transnationalization of the state (Robinson, William) in Historical materialism and globalization’, in Historical materialism and globalization, vol. Warwick studies in globalisation, London: Routledge, 2002.
[17]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter “Postcolonialism (Siba N. Grovogui.)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 247–265.
[18]
S. Halperin, ‘“International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity”’, in Decolonizing international relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1343740&ppg=48
[19]
R. Shilliam, ‘“Who will Provide the West with Therapy?”’, in The vulnerable subject: beyond rationalism in international relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1109213&ppg=140
[20]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter “Constructivism (K. M. Fierke.)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 187–204.
[21]
A. Wendt, ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[22]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter “Poststructuralism (David Campbell.)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[23]
J. Agnew, ‘Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking’, Ethics & Global Politics, vol. 1, no. 4, 2008, doi: 10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892.
[24]
K. C. Dunn, ‘Chapter "Introduction: Identity and International Relations in the "Heart of Darkness.”" in Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity’, in Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity, New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=188816&site=eds-live&scope=site
[25]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapters “Feminism (J. Ann Tickner and Laura Sjoberg.)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 205–222.
[26]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter “Green Theory (Eckersley, Robyn.)” in International relations theories: discipline and diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 266–286.
[27]
R. Falkner, ‘Global environmentalism and the greening of international society’, International Affairs, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 503–522, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01086.x.
[28]
T. M. Wilson and H. Donnan, A companion to border studies, vol. Blackwell companions to anthropology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=882612
[29]
T. M. Wilson and H. Donnan, A companion to border studies, vol. Blackwell companions to anthropology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=882612
[30]
H. Spruyt, The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change, vol. Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
[31]
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett, ‘The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 267–293, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013934?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[32]
R. O. Keohane, ‘Chapter 1’, in After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy, 1st Princeton classic ed., vol. A Princeton classic edition, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005.
[33]
S. Halperin, ‘“International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity”’, in Decolonizing international relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1343740&ppg=48
[34]
R. Shilliam, ‘“Who will Provide the West with Therapy?”’, in The vulnerable subject: beyond rationalism in international relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1109213&ppg=140
