[1]
Agnew, J. 2008. Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics. 1, 4 (2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892.
[2]
Burbank, J. and Cooper, F. 2010. Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
[3]
Czempiel, E.O. and Rosenau, J.N. 1989. ‘Production, the State, and Change in World Order’ in Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s. Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s. Lexington Books.
[4]
Dunn, K.C. 2003. Chapter "Introduction: Identity and International Relations in the "Heart of Darkness.”" in Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. Palgrave Macmillan.
[5]
Dunn, K.C. 2003. Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. Palgrave Macmillan.
[6]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter 5 Bruce Russett ‘Liberalism’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[7]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter 6 Jennifer Sterling-Folker.  "Neoliberalism.” International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter ‘Constructivism (K. M. Fierke.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press. 187–204.
[9]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter ‘Green Theory (Eckersley, Robyn.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press. 266–286.
[10]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter ‘Marxism (Mark Rupert)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter ‘Postcolonialism (Siba N. Grovogui.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press. 247–265.
[12]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter ‘Poststructuralism (David Campbell.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapter ‘Structural Realism (John J. Mearsheimer)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press. 77–93.
[14]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Chapters ‘Feminism (J. Ann Tickner and Laura Sjoberg.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press. 205–222.
[15]
Dunne, T. et al. eds. 2016. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Dunne, T. et al. 2016. Introduction and chapter 1. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press. 1–35.
[17]
Falkner, R. 2012. Global environmentalism and the greening of international society. International Affairs. 88, 3 (2012), 503–522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01086.x.
[18]
Halperin, S. 2006. ‘International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’. Decolonizing international relations. Rowman & Littlefield.
[19]
Halperin, S. 2006. ‘International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’. Decolonizing international relations. Rowman & Littlefield.
[20]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1990. Introduction: In: Explaining and understanding international relations. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon. 1–15.
[21]
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 2 (1997), 267–293.
[22]
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 2 (1997), 267–293.
[23]
Keohane, R.O. 2005. Chapter 1. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
[24]
Keohane, R.O. 2005. Chapter 1. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
[25]
Rupert, M. and Smith, H. 2002. Capitalist globalization and the transnationalization of the state (Robinson, William) in Historical materialism and globalization. Historical materialism and globalization. Routledge.
[26]
Shilliam, R. 2013. ‘Who will Provide the West with Therapy?’ The vulnerable subject: beyond rationalism in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[27]
Shilliam, R. 2013. ‘Who will Provide the West with Therapy?’ The vulnerable subject: beyond rationalism in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[28]
Spruyt, H. 1996. Chapter 8 in ‘The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change’ / Spruyt. The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton University Press. 153–180.
[29]
Spruyt, H. 1996. The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton University Press.
[30]
Spruyt, H. 1996. The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton University Press.
[31]
Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 2 (1992), 391–425.
[32]
Wilson, T.M. and Donnan, H. 2012. A companion to border studies. Wiley-Blackwell.
[33]
Wilson, T.M. and Donnan, H. 2012. A companion to border studies. Wiley-Blackwell.
[34]
Wilson, T.M. and Donnan, H. 2012. Chapter 8 Borders in the New Imperialism. A companion to border studies. Wiley-Blackwell.