1
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
2
Dunn KC. Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. New York, N.Y.: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=188816&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3
Spruyt H. The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1996.
4
Hollis M, Smith S. Introduction: In: Explaining and understanding international relations. In: Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: : Clarendon 1990. 1–15.
5
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Introduction and chapter 1. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. 1–35.
6
Burbank J, Cooper F. Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2010.
7
Wilson TM, Donnan H. Chapter 8 Borders in the New Imperialism. In: A companion to border studies. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118255223
8
Spruyt H. Chapter 8 in ‘The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change’ / Spruyt. In: The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1996. 153–80.
9
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Structural Realism (John J. Mearsheimer)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. 77–93.
10
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 5 Bruce Russett ‘Liberalism’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
11
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 6 Jennifer Sterling-Folker. "Neoliberalism.” International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
12
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:267–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013934?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
13
Keohane RO. Chapter 1. In: After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2005.
14
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Marxism (Mark Rupert)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
15
Czempiel EO, Rosenau JN. ‘Production, the State, and Change in World Order’ in Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s. In: Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s. Lexington, Mass: : Lexington Books 1989.
16
Rupert M, Smith H. Capitalist globalization and the transnationalization of the state (Robinson, William) in Historical materialism and globalization. In: Historical materialism and globalization. London: : Routledge 2002.
17
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Postcolonialism (Siba N. Grovogui.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. 247–65.
18
Halperin S. ‘International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’. In: Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, MD: : Rowman & Littlefield 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1343740&ppg=48
19
Shilliam R. ‘Who will Provide the West with Therapy?’ In: The vulnerable subject: beyond rationalism in international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1109213&ppg=140
20
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Constructivism (K. M. Fierke.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. 187–204.
21
Wendt A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 1992;46:391–425.https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Poststructuralism (David Campbell.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
23
Agnew J. Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics 2008;1. doi:10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892
24
Dunn KC. Chapter "Introduction: Identity and International Relations in the "Heart of Darkness.”" in Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. In: Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. New York, N.Y.: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003. https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=188816&site=eds-live&scope=site
25
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapters ‘Feminism (J. Ann Tickner and Laura Sjoberg.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. 205–22.
26
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Green Theory (Eckersley, Robyn.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. 266–86.
27
Falkner R. Global environmentalism and the greening of international society. International Affairs 2012;88:503–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01086.x
28
Wilson TM, Donnan H. A companion to border studies. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=882612
29
Wilson TM, Donnan H. A companion to border studies. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=882612
30
Spruyt H. The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1996.
31
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:267–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013934?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
32
Keohane RO. Chapter 1. In: After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2005.
33
Halperin S. ‘International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’. In: Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, MD: : Rowman & Littlefield 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1343740&ppg=48
34
Shilliam R. ‘Who will Provide the West with Therapy?’ In: The vulnerable subject: beyond rationalism in international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1109213&ppg=140
