1.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
2.
Dunn KC. Imagining the Congo: The International Relations of Identity. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=188816&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3.
Spruyt H. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Vol Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton University Press; 1996.
4.
Hollis M, Smith S. Introduction: In: Explaining and understanding international relations. In: Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Clarendon; 1990:1-15.
5.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Introduction and chapter 1. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016:1-35.
6.
Burbank J, Cooper F. Empires in world history: power and the politics of difference. In: Princeton University Press; 2010.
7.
Wilson TM, Donnan H. Chapter 8 Borders in the New Imperialism. In: A Companion to Border Studies. Vol Blackwell companions to anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118255223
8.
Spruyt H. Chapter 8 in ‘The sovereign state and its competitors: an analysis of systems change’ / Spruyt. In: The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Vol Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton University Press; 1996:153-180.
9.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Structural Realism (John J. Mearsheimer)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016:77-93.
10.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 5 Bruce Russett ‘Liberalism’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016.
11.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 6 Jennifer Sterling-Folker. "Neoliberalism.” International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016.
12.
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(2):267-293. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013934?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
13.
Keohane RO. Chapter 1. In: After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Vol A Princeton classic edition. 1st Princeton classic ed. Princeton University Press; 2005.
14.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Marxism (Mark Rupert)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016.
15.
Czempiel EO, Rosenau JN. ‘Production, the State, and Change in World Order’ in Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world politics for the 1990s. In: Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Vol Issues in world politics. Lexington Books; 1989.
16.
Rupert M, Smith H. Capitalist globalization and the transnationalization of the state (Robinson, William) in Historical materialism and globalization. In: Historical Materialism and Globalization. Vol Warwick studies in globalisation. Routledge; 2002.
17.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Postcolonialism (Siba N. Grovogui.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016:247-265.
18.
Halperin S. ‘International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’. In: Decolonizing International Relations. Rowman & Littlefield; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1343740&ppg=48
19.
Shilliam R. ‘Who will Provide the West with Therapy?’ In: The Vulnerable Subject: Beyond Rationalism in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1109213&ppg=140
20.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Constructivism (K. M. Fierke.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016:187-204.
21.
Wendt A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46(2):391-425. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Poststructuralism (David Campbell.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016.
23.
Agnew J. Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics. 2008;1(4). doi:10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892
24.
Dunn KC. Chapter "Introduction: Identity and International Relations in the "Heart of Darkness.”" in Imagining the Congo: the international relations of identity. In: Imagining the Congo: The International Relations of Identity. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003. https://search-ebscohost-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=188816&site=eds-live&scope=site
25.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapters ‘Feminism (J. Ann Tickner and Laura Sjoberg.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016:205-222.
26.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter ‘Green Theory (Eckersley, Robyn.)’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2016:266-286.
27.
Falkner R. Global environmentalism and the greening of international society. International Affairs. 2012;88(3):503-522. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01086.x
28.
Wilson TM, Donnan H. A Companion to Border Studies. Vol Blackwell companions to anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=882612
29.
Wilson TM, Donnan H. A Companion to Border Studies. Vol Blackwell companions to anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=882612
30.
Spruyt H. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Vol Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton University Press; 1996.
31.
John R. Oneal and Bruce M. Russett. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(2):267-293. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013934?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
32.
Keohane RO. Chapter 1. In: After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Vol A Princeton classic edition. 1st Princeton classic ed. Princeton University Press; 2005.
33.
Halperin S. ‘International Relations: Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’. In: Decolonizing International Relations. Rowman & Littlefield; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1343740&ppg=48
34.
Shilliam R. ‘Who will Provide the West with Therapy?’ In: The Vulnerable Subject: Beyond Rationalism in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=1109213&ppg=140
