1.
McGarty C, Haslam SA. The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society. Blackwell Publishers; 1997.
2.
Dunn D. Research Methods for Social Psychology. Second edition. Wiley; 2013.
3.
Breakwell GM, Breakwell GM. Doing Social Psychology Research. Blackwell; 2004. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=351081
4.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY THEORY.
5.
Goethals G. A Century of Social Psychology: Individuals, Ideas, and Investigations. In: Hogg M, Cooper JM, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology: Concise Student Edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2007:3-23. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=3032299&ppg=22
6.
D.M. M, E.R. S. Intergroup Emotions. Published online 2014. http://blogs.iu.edu/smithlab/files/2016/03/APA-handbook-22g9wu0.pdf
7.
P.G. D. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Published online 1989. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1989-15262-001&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
8.
Seger CR, Smith ER, Mackie DM. Subtle activation of a social categorization triggers group-level emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009;45(3):460-467. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.004
9.
Schmid K, Hewstone M, Küpper B, Zick A, Wagner U. Secondary Transfer Effects of Intergroup Contact. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2012;75(1):28-51. doi:10.1177/0190272511430235
10.
Turner R, West K. Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology. Published online 2010. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=49814448&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
11.
Barlow, FKPaolini, SPedersen, AHornsey, MJRadke, HRMHarwood, JRubin, MSibley, CG. The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN. Published online 2012. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000311570600008&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
12.
Nelson TD. Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons. MIT Press; 2002.
13.
Abrams, William Dominic JoshuaSwift, Hannah J.Lamont, Ruth A.Abrams, Dominic. BMJ OPEN. Published online 2012. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000315044800076&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
14.
Swift, Hannah J.. Centre for the Study of Group Processes, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom, H.J.Swift@kent.ac.uk Abrams, Dominic. Centre for the Study of Group Processes, University of Kent, Canterbury, United KingdomLamont, Ruth A.. Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, EnglandDrury, Lisbeth. University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2017;11(1):195-231. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-02210-007&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
15.
Engel C. Dictator games: a meta study. Experimental Economics. 2011;14(4):583-610. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
16.
Yamagishi, TLi, YTakagishi, HMatsumoto, YKiyonari, T. In Search of Homo economicus. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE. Published online 2014. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000342923600005&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
17.
Fleming P, Zizzo DJ. A simple stress test of experimenter demand effects. Theory and Decision. 2015;78(2):219-231. doi:10.1007/s11238-014-9419-2
18.
Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1998;28(15):1429-1464. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
19.
Armitage CJ; Centre for Research in Social Attitudes, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK.Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. The British Journal Of Social Psychology. 2001;40. https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=11795063&site=ehost-live
20.
Martine, SteadStephen, TaggAnne Marie, MacKintoshDouglas, Eadie. Development and evaluation of a mass media Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. Health Education Research. 2005;20(1):36-50. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00055749.200502000.00004&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
21.
Gan M, Chen S. Being Your Actual or Ideal Self? What It Means to Feel Authentic in a Relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2017;43(4):465-478. doi:10.1177/0146167216688211
22.
Cacioppo S, Zhou H, Monteleone G, et al. You are in sync with me: Neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience. 2014;277:842-858. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.051
23.
Hofman W, Finkel E, Fitzsimons G. Close Relationships and Self-Regulation: How Relationship Satisfaction Faci... JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. Published online 2015. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000360444400005&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
24.
Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2005;25(3):273-291. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
25.
Steg L, Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2009;29(3):309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
26.
Truelove, HBCarrico, ARWeber, EURaimi, KTVandenbergh, MP. Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS. Published online 2014. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000348017200012&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
27.
Ederyn, Williams. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin. 1977;84(5):963-976. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00006823.197709000.00009&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
28.
Parks MR, Floyd K. Making Friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006;1(4). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x
29.
Costa Pinto D, Reale G, Segabinazzi R, Vargas Rossi CA. Online identity construction: How gamers redefine their identity in experiential communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2015;14(6):399-409. doi:10.1002/cb.1556
30.
Kenneth J., Gergen. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973;26(2):309-320. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00005205.197305000.00020&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
31.
Parker, Ian. Division of Psychology and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom, i.a.parker@mmu.ac.uk. Critical psychology: What it is and what it is not. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2007;1(1):1-15. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2008-07777-001&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
32.
Clarke V. Men Not Included? Journal of GLBT Family Studies. 2007;3(4):309-349. doi:10.1300/J461v03n04_01
33.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY METHODS.
34.
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-Positive Psychology. Psychological Science. 2011;22(11):1359-1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
35.
Yong E. Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature. 2012;485(7398):298-300. doi:10.1038/485298a
36.
S.T. F. Mob Rule or Wisdom of Crowds? http://datacolada.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Fiske-presidential-guest-column_APS-Observer_copy-edited.pdf
37.
King M, Gordon B. Social Desirability Bias: A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing. Psychology & Marketing. Published online 2000. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11580068&site=ehost-live
38.
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education. Published online 2010. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-24921-002&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
39.
Allen E, Seaman C. Statistics Roundtable: Likert Scales and Data Analyses. http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/07/statistics/likert-scales-and-data-analyses.html
40.
Janice, RattrayMartyn C, Jones. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007;16(2):234-243. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00019038.200702000.00003&site=ehost-live
41.
Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;97(1):17-41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
42.
Kevin A, FentonAnne M, JohnsonSally, McManusBob, Erens. Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2001;77(2):01-92. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00115314.200104000.00003&site=ehost-live
43.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlEastAnglia?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNTI5NDk3L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAtQnJ5bWFuLUZNNi5odG1sIn0%3D
44.
Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Third edition. SAGE; 2015.
45.
Richards L, Morse JM. Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. 3rd ed. Sage; 2013.
46.
Mason J. Qualitative Researching. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2002.
47.
King N, Horrocks C, Brooks JM. Interviews in Qualitative Research. 2nd edition. SAGE; 2019. https://catalyst.talis.com/uea/books/9781473986923
48.
Eaton S. Research Assistant Training Manual: Focus Groups. https://drsaraheaton.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/ra-training-manual-focus-groups-2017-02-10.pdf
49.
Nicholas A, Maner J. The Good-Subject Effect: Investigating Participant Demand Characteristics. Journal of General Psychology. Published online 2008. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=31857845&site=ehost-live
50.
Millsap RE, Maydeu-Olivares A. The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology. SAGE; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=743581
51.
Durgin FH, Baird JA, Greenburg M, Russell R, Shaughnessy K, Waymouth S. Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16(5):964-969. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.964
52.
Coe R. What effect size is and why it is important? http://www.cem.org/attachments/ebe/ESguide.pdf
53.
Ryan RS, Wilde M, Crist S. Compared to a small, supervised lab experiment, a large, unsupervised web-based experiment on a previously unknown effect has benefits that outweigh its potential costs. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(4):1295-1301. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.024
54.
Gary L. Brase. How different types of participant payments alter task performance. Judgment and Decision Making,. 2009;(2009):419-428. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.13628188419c483d9f2576996e16db38&site=ehost-live
55.
Anderson C, Lindsay J, Bushman B. Research in the Psychological Laboratory: Truth or Triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science. Published online 1999. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20182544&site=ehost-live
56.
Mitchell G. Revisiting Truth or Triviality. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7(2):109-117. doi:10.1177/1745691611432343
57.
Schmuckler M. What Is Ecological Validity? A Dimensional Analysis. Infancy. Published online 2001. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=5477434&site=ehost-live
58.
Green DP, McGrath MC, Aronow PM. Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 2013;23(1):27-48. doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.728223
59.
Desposato S. Ethical Challenges and Some Solutions for Field Experiments. http://www.desposato.org/ethicsfieldexperiments.pdf
60.
Salovey, Peter. Field Experiments in Social Psychology: Message Framing and the Promotion of Health Protective Behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist. 2004;47(5):488-505. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2003-10602-002&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
61.
Tsatsou P. Digital technologies in the research process: Lessons from the digital research community in the UK. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;61:597-608. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.053
62.
Dhiraj Murthy. Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. 42(5):837-855. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.42857191&site=ehost-live
63.
Ryan T, Walker R. Life Story Work: Why, What, How and When. Sixth edition. CoramBAAF, Adoption & Fostering Academy; 2016.
64.
Podwalking: A framework for assimilating mobile methods into action research. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/59970/
