1
McGarty C, Haslam SA. The message of social psychology: perspectives on mind in society. Cambridge, Mass: : Blackwell Publishers 1997.
2
Dunn D. Research methods for social psychology. Second edition. Hoboken, NJ: : Wiley 2013.
3
Breakwell GM, Breakwell GM. Doing social psychology research. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2004. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=351081
4
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY THEORY.
5
Goethals G. A Century of Social Psychology: Individuals, Ideas, and Investigations. In: Hogg M, Cooper JM, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology: Concise Student Edition. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2007. 3–23.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/reader.action?docID=3032299&ppg=22
6
D.M. M, E.R. S. Intergroup Emotions. Published Online First: 2014.http://blogs.iu.edu/smithlab/files/2016/03/APA-handbook-22g9wu0.pdf
7
P.G. D. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Published Online First: 1989.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1989-15262-001&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
8
Seger CR, Smith ER, Mackie DM. Subtle activation of a social categorization triggers group-level emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009;45:460–7. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.004
9
Schmid K, Hewstone M, Küpper B, et al. Secondary Transfer Effects of Intergroup Contact. Social Psychology Quarterly 2012;75:28–51. doi:10.1177/0190272511430235
10
Turner R, West K. Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology Published Online First: 2010.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=49814448&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
11
Barlow, FKPaolini, SPedersen, AHornsey, MJRadke, HRMHarwood, JRubin, MSibley, CG. The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Published Online First: 2012.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000311570600008&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
12
Nelson TD. Ageism: stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2002.
13
Abrams, William Dominic JoshuaSwift, Hannah J.Lamont, Ruth A.Abrams, Dominic. BMJ OPEN. Published Online First: 2012.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000315044800076&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
14
Swift, Hannah J.. Centre for the Study of Group Processes, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom, H.J.Swift@kent.ac.uk Abrams, Dominic. Centre for the Study of Group Processes, University of Kent, Canterbury, United KingdomLamont, Ruth A.. Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, EnglandDrury, Lisbeth. University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2017;11:195–231.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-02210-007&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
15
Engel C. Dictator games: a meta study. Experimental Economics 2011;14:583–610. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
16
Yamagishi, TLi, YTakagishi, HMatsumoto, YKiyonari, T. In Search of Homo economicus. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Published Online First: 2014.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000342923600005&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
17
Fleming P, Zizzo DJ. A simple stress test of experimenter demand effects. Theory and Decision 2015;78:219–31. doi:10.1007/s11238-014-9419-2
18
Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1998;28:1429–64. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x
19
Armitage CJ; Centre for Research in Social Attitudes, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK.Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. The British Journal Of Social Psychology 2001;40.https://uea.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=11795063&site=ehost-live
20
Martine, SteadStephen, TaggAnne Marie, MacKintoshDouglas, Eadie. Development and evaluation of a mass media Theory of Planned Behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. Health Education Research 2005;20:36–50.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00055749.200502000.00004&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
21
Gan M, Chen S. Being Your Actual or Ideal Self? What It Means to Feel Authentic in a Relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2017;43:465–78. doi:10.1177/0146167216688211
22
Cacioppo S, Zhou H, Monteleone G, et al. You are in sync with me: Neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner. Neuroscience 2014;277:842–58. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.051
23
Hofman W, Finkel E, Fitzsimons G. Close Relationships and Self-Regulation: How Relationship Satisfaction Faci... JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Published Online First: 2015.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000360444400005&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
24
Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, et al. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005;25:273–91. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
25
Steg L, Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009;29:309–17. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
26
Truelove, HBCarrico, ARWeber, EURaimi, KTVandenbergh, MP. Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS Published Online First: 2014.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000348017200012&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
27
Ederyn, Williams. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin 1977;84:963–76.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00006823.197709000.00009&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
28
Parks MR, Floyd K. Making Friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006;1. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x
29
Costa Pinto D, Reale G, Segabinazzi R, et al. Online identity construction: How gamers redefine their identity in experiential communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2015;14:399–409. doi:10.1002/cb.1556
30
Kenneth J., Gergen. Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973;26:309–20.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00005205.197305000.00020&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
31
Parker, Ian. Division of Psychology and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom, i.a.parker@mmu.ac.uk. Critical psychology: What it is and what it is not. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2007;1:1–15.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2008-07777-001&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
32
Clarke V. Men Not Included? Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2007;3:309–49. doi:10.1300/J461v03n04_01
33
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY METHODS.
34
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-Positive Psychology. Psychological Science 2011;22:1359–66. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
35
Yong E. Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature 2012;485:298–300. doi:10.1038/485298a
36
S.T. F. Mob Rule or Wisdom of Crowds? http://datacolada.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Fiske-presidential-guest-column_APS-Observer_copy-edited.pdf
37
King M, Gordon B. Social Desirability Bias: A Neglected Aspect of Validity Testing. Psychology & Marketing Published Online First: 2000.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11580068&site=ehost-live
38
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education Published Online First: 2010.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-24921-002&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
39
Allen E, Seaman C. Statistics Roundtable: Likert Scales and Data Analyses. http://asq.org/quality-progress/2007/07/statistics/likert-scales-and-data-analyses.html
40
Janice, RattrayMartyn C, Jones. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007;16:234–43.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00019038.200702000.00003&site=ehost-live
41
Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, et al. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009;97:17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
42
Kevin A, FentonAnne M, JohnsonSally, McManusBob, Erens. Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2001;77:01–92.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsovi&AN=edsovi.00115314.200104000.00003&site=ehost-live
43
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlEastAnglia?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNTI5NDk3L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAtQnJ5bWFuLUZNNi5odG1sIn0%3D
44
Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Third edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
45
Richards L, Morse JM. Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: : Sage 2013.
46
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: : SAGE 2002.
47
King N, Horrocks C, Brooks JM. Interviews in qualitative research. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2019. https://catalyst.talis.com/uea/books/9781473986923
48
Eaton S. Research Assistant Training Manual: Focus Groups. https://drsaraheaton.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/ra-training-manual-focus-groups-2017-02-10.pdf
49
Nicholas A, Maner J. The Good-Subject Effect: Investigating Participant Demand Characteristics. Journal of General Psychology Published Online First: 2008.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=31857845&site=ehost-live
50
Millsap RE, Maydeu-Olivares A. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: : SAGE 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uea/detail.action?docID=743581
51
Durgin FH, Baird JA, Greenburg M, et al. Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009;16:964–9. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.964
52
Coe R. What effect size is and why it is important? http://www.cem.org/attachments/ebe/ESguide.pdf
53
Ryan RS, Wilde M, Crist S. Compared to a small, supervised lab experiment, a large, unsupervised web-based experiment on a previously unknown effect has benefits that outweigh its potential costs. Computers in Human Behavior 2013;29:1295–301. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.024
54
Gary L. Brase. How different types of participant payments alter task performance. Judgment and Decision Making, 2009;:419–28.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.13628188419c483d9f2576996e16db38&site=ehost-live
55
Anderson C, Lindsay J, Bushman B. Research in the Psychological Laboratory: Truth or Triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science Published Online First: 1999.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20182544&site=ehost-live
56
Mitchell G. Revisiting Truth or Triviality. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012;7:109–17. doi:10.1177/1745691611432343
57
Schmuckler M. What Is Ecological Validity? A Dimensional Analysis. Infancy Published Online First: 2001.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=5477434&site=ehost-live
58
Green DP, McGrath MC, Aronow PM. Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 2013;23:27–48. doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.728223
59
Desposato S. Ethical Challenges and Some Solutions for Field Experiments. http://www.desposato.org/ethicsfieldexperiments.pdf
60
Salovey, Peter. Field Experiments in Social Psychology: Message Framing and the Promotion of Health Protective Behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist 2004;47:488–505.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2003-10602-002&authtype=sso&custid=s8993828&site=ehost-live
61
Tsatsou P. Digital technologies in the research process: Lessons from the digital research community in the UK. Computers in Human Behavior 2016;61:597–608. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.053
62
Dhiraj Murthy. Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Digital Ethnography: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research;42:837–55.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.42857191&site=ehost-live
63
Ryan T, Walker R. Life story work: why, what, how and when. Sixth edition. London: : CoramBAAF, Adoption & Fostering Academy 2016.
64
Podwalking: A framework for assimilating mobile methods into action research. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/59970/
